U.S. Policy Towards Syria: Will it be based on Western Supremacy or the values of a New Paradigm?

Transcript by Rawan Mahmasa

I would like to thank Helga LaRouche and all of you for inviting me to speak to this very important conference with which I find many points in common to talk about. As our topic is the strategic crisis facing the human race, I would like to start with the International Security Strategic Guidance that was put out by President Biden in March two thousand twenty one. First, to clarify where this new American administration is going and what is our what are our expectations or how do we read this guidance as people who are always subject of American policies rather than participants in formulating world policy?

The strategic guidance put by President Biden and I’m referring to this one for those of you who haven’t read it, starts from the concept of Western supremacy. What President Biden stresses is the American alliance and partnership with Europe or with NATO. And what he tries to encourage is to invite countries in the world to have a world NATO instead of just a transatlantic NATO. Now, the the issue here is that the strategic guidance considers this block of country, of NATO countries are the ones who promote democracy, who acknowledge human rights, and who should teach the world how to have similar systems.

Anyone or any country who doesn’t fit into this criteria is considered either an autocrat or an aggressor, including Russia and China. Those are, according to this guidance, autocratic system, and they constitute a threat to this democracy. So here is the problem that there is a number of countries who formulate an alliance and who consider themselves to hold the superior value in the world, by the way, linked with interests. Always when they speak about values, they speak about also achieving American interests and promoting and promoting American values.

So those countries are the ones who have or possess these values. And anyone who is or who joins them becomes a part of this alliance and partnership.

And anyone who doesn’t or who has a different idea of governance or different way of life is considered either an autocrat or an aggressor. And the other threat that comes to the mind of this group of countries is technology is the rise of China, which seems to be an obsession in this guidance, how to stop the rise of China. The problem I see here is that we are not looking or they are not looking in this guidance at the world as as a human community, that they are looking at the white supremacy and other countries who shouldn’t act as these white supremacists under the name of democracy and human rights, whatever you call it.

Now, as I Syrian woman who lived through 10 years of war in Syria, I find this logic extremely dangerous, particularly as I know and as we experienced that the democracy they talk about is only to make our countries satellite states to their countries, which means there’s no sense of equality or human brotherhood between their countries and our country. The logic I hear from China and Russia is the logic that says, prosperity should prevail for all, we should fight poverty, for example.

That’s what the Chinese see poverty and do poverty in China. But we should fight poverty everywhere else in the world because we live in one world. We should share its resources and we should act together for its prosperity. In the case of Syria, that calls the Western calls for democracy and freedom, that was really that caused the injury of thousands and hundreds of thousands of terrorists into our country, that caused the destruction of our schools, our infrastructure, all the schools knocked our country 100 years backwards.

And from my point of view, as a Syrian woman who always lived in this land and will always live on this land no matter what, I can tell you that the reason for this war on Syria is that Syria has an independent political mind and and an independent political decision. And this is not welcome at all by these circles who want the whole world to be a copy of what they think of what they want. And no one has the right to have, for example, a different democracy or a different way of life or a different culture that leads to things that we probably appreciate here in Syria, where other people appreciate different things.

So the issue I found with this strategy is that it left no room to the variety of human nature, to the variety of human culture, to the variety of human likings and dislikings. So Syria, for example, in 2010, had the fourth developing economy in the world and now they destroyed our economy. They destroyed our schools. They destroyed our way of life. They destroyed our identity through a flood of terrorism that came through Turkey, of course, into our country.

And the issue is that I’m sure all of you hear that the United States is in the northeast of Syria in order to fight ISIL and in order to fight terrorism. Now, if we are fighting terrorism, which we are definitely because it’s our interest, it’s our life to live the free of terrorism. And if they are here to fight terrorism, why can’t we join forces together to fight terrorism? I tell you, the United States and the allied forces with them in Syria are here to protect the terrorists. And this is what they had been doing. If it were not for the presence of the United States forces in the al-Tanf and if it were not for their military attack against our forces, we would have liberated the entire Syrian soil from terrorism.

The other objective for them is to prevent any relation between Iraq and Syria, because the relation between Iraq and Syria is extremely vital for the Syrian people and for the Iraqi people.

So what I would like to say is that the world today is facing a crisis, that the new American administration is focusing on alliances and partnerships in the face of China and Russia and in the face of any country who dares to be different from their democratic way of life, who dares have their own democracy, who dares have their own independent resources.

Otherwise, how how on earth could the U.S. justify looting our oil and our wheat and preventing our people from our natural resources?

Here I come to the second problem and the strategy and the guidance to this strategy, which is the difference between what is being coined in language and the practices on the ground. The practices on the ground is that this Western block, as Biden referred to it, with its partners and its alliances, do not see us as people.

They see they see our oil, they see our wheat, they see our geographic position. But they do not care at all what kind of life we live, what kind of problems they create for us.

My conclusion from this is that we need a different paradigm for the future of humanity. And I can see that China and Russia and Iran and Syria and Venezuela and the Schiller Institute and all of you who believe in the dignity of the human self and in the independence and in the sovereignty of every state in the world, big or small, are working for this brotherhood among all countries in the world with no superior and inferior, with no people who want to say one size fits all. No one size does not fit all.

We come from a different culture. We have a different point of view. We like to build our future according to what we want. We enjoy. We appreciate this is what would save the world, the acknowledgment that God created all of us in different places with different cultures, with different languages, but only to enjoy the differences, not to give a carte blanche for those who believe they are superior to others, as they did with indigenous civilizations, which were wiped out by them, and which caused huge, horrible loss to human history and to human wealth and to human education and to human civilization.

I hope we will join forces together, East and people in West in order to create a world where people feel respected and where people feel that their different culture is an asset rather than something to be punished or something to be eroded if they can.

I thank you for inviting me to this conference, and I truly hope that we could be active in joining a partnership that would ensure a much better future for the world with no supremacy, no occupation, no terrorism exists.

Thank you very much.